Will going against nation help Congress to win the election?

Recently Rahul Gandhi recently gives a statement that “China blocks move to ban Masood Azhar ‘weak’ Narendra Modi scared” rather than the words of opposition party it more  sounds like the words of spokesperson of Jaiesh –e –Mohammed on India, USA, France and UK failure in UNSC just because of  China blocking Masood Azhar’s designation as a global terrorist and this is not the first time when Rahul Gandhi seems to be happy just because Modi govt fails at something and he gets a topic to blame the Modi government and make it a baseless issue but he forget in his vote bank politics he became the poster boy of Pakistan and he doesn’t understand the simple difference but raising question against the govt and raising question against the nation.

You will get the idea that how much he is popular in Pakistan, these terrorist outfit organizations by this that in an open interview given to the news agency in Pakistan the head of terrorist outfit Lashkar e Taiba Hafiz Saeed consider Rahul Gandhi as a good person and when a terrorist praises you that it’s not a good sign for that person and for that political party because they have done something wrong with the nation by which these terrorist organizations are benefited and in case of Congress and Rahul Gandhi. There is not a one or two things there are plenty of blunders done by them. Like after 9/11 congress party didn’t take any serious action just like Modi govt did on a couple of occasion after URI and Pulwama attacks. Rahul Gandhi also designated a terrorist as Masood Azhar Ji and asked the same question which these terrorist want to ask, they continued asking for the proofs of the attack in Pulwama and speaking the same language of Pakistan and terrorist.

This terrorist organizations like Rahul Gandhi and Congress party so much just because they know that this is the only party which can help them to fulfill their prophecy of Ghazwa e Hind and recent incident prove this true and they know this is the party which compromised the security of nation on the name of Dalali in defense deal also. They know this party doesn’t possess that leadership and decision making quality which current government has and which is very dangerous for them. Rahul Gandhi just wants to win the election and become the PM of the country at any cost for that even he has to compromise with the national interest or just to speak the same language of terrorists and Pakistan.

Maybe just because of this at that time Mahatma Gandhi wanted to disband the Congress.

Three mistakes of Indira Gandhi’s Life

Indira Priyadarshini Gandhi India’s 3rd and only lady Prime minister in history. She had many marvelous achievements on her name which will never be forgotten in the history, like India’s first nuclear test and also for some work, never done by any leader in the world like in December 1971 changing the world map with India’s decisive victory over Pakistan in the liberation war, that led to the formation of independent Bangladesh. But there are some marvelous blunders also done by the same Indira Gandhi. Here I mention 3 mistakes done by her which can also not be easily forgotten by the nation and on which the question should be raised.

  • The first mistake – In 1971 she had the great opportunity to resolve the Kashmir problem once for all, not only the Kashmir problem but also the terrorism issue. Pakistan would have not become a terrorist state creating problems for India. In 1971 India had 93000 POW (Prisoners of war) which Indira Gandhi gave them for free along with the land captured by the Indian force. She could have put many sanctions on Pakistan like limiting the number of Army personnel in the area, taking back POK never interfering in Kashmir valley and many more just like the USA did to Germany after the first world war in 1918 in the treaty of Versailles. Beside this the Balochistani should not be oppressed by the Pakistani army. these are the same troops which were held POW in Bangladesh and after 1972 deployed in the Balochistan. This raises some serious questions on her geopolitics knowledge and strategies.
  • Second mistake – Emergency – in 1975 she tried to control the judiciary system just because in an election petition filed by her opponent, Raj Narain in 1971 (who later defeated her in 1977 parliamentary election from Raebareli), alleged several major as well as minor instances of using government resources for campaigning. On 12 June 1975, the Allahabad High Court declared Indira Gandhi’s election to the Lok Sabha in 1971 void on grounds of electoral malpractice. Many historians believe this being the one of the main reasons behind the emergency declared by her on 25 June 1975. During Emergency Police were granted powers to impose curfews and indefinitely detain citizens. All publications were subjected to substantial censorship by the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting. This shows her hunger for power that she didn’t want to lose the PM chair and power at any costs.
  • Third mistake – the rise of Bhindranwale – in late 1970 Indira Gandhi supported the Jarnail Singh Bhindranwale in a bid to split the Sikh votes and weaken the Akali dal its chief rival in Punjab. Bhindranwale was originally not very influential, but the activities of Congress elevated him to the status of a major leader by the early 1980s. Bhindranwale was responsible for the launching the Sikh militancy during the 1980s. Since the early 1980s, Bhindranwale was supported by Pakistan’s ISI on his radical separatist stand, plans and operations and this rise of Bhindranwale which was ended up with operation blue star and which also became the reason of the assassination of Indira Gandhi.

Had Indira Gandhi not made these 3 mistakes, the nation would have remembered her as a different leader. But now whenever someone says her iron lady, such questions start boggling into the minds of countrymen.

SECULARISM IS NEW COMUNALLISM

What is secularism well according to Wikipedia Secularism in India … With the 42nd Amendment of the Constitution of India enacted in 1976, the Preamble to the Constitution asserted that India is a secular nation. However, neither India’s constitution nor its laws define the relationship between religion and state. In recent trends, if we see many of us claimed that they are secular but deep in them they either hate or love one community more as compared to others. So I have doubt whether they are really a secular or not or they just pretended to be a secular so that it is easy for them to abuse the other community which is in the majority.

Recently if we see some media houses and read some popular print media houses who claim themselves secular and liberals we will get to know how the definition of secularism is changed by them and we will also see that how on the name of secularism they are trying to appease only one or two communities and targeting others which are in majority by manipulating the news headlines or by putting the saints image in the news of some wrongdoing did by Maula Saheb and father of the church which many times did by the print media houses like THE HINDU.

On the one hand some mainstream media is crying aloud for AKHLAQ from UP but on the other hand they did not shed a single tear for RAMALINGAM from Kerala who was murdered by some Muslim by chopping off his hand (According to sharia law) because he is confronted some Muslim who tried to convert some SC caste people and just because he is a Hindu. On the one hand they are very outrageous for kathua rape case which is good but why it comes only for few cases why not all the time whenever there is crime against women whether it is Kerala nun rape case or Gangotri case in which a Minor SC girl burnt by Maula Saheb for resisting his sexual advances from Kowthalam Mandal, KNL,Andhra-Pradesh and there are many case which is not covered by these secular mainstream media Which clearly shows how these media on the name of secularism spreading communalism.

Even if we talk about many political parties like Congress, SP, TMC and many more they are also doing the same they claimed themselves as a secular by visiting temples, church, and Mosque but if they are so secular they never oppose the Citizenship (Amendment) Bill, 2016 which give the permanent citizenship to the member of 6 minority communities in our country who is seeking the shelter but on the other hand they supported the Rohingya’s settlement in the country and one of the reason they are opposing the bill just because it did not include that community whom they are trying to appease from the last 60 years and why they are opposing the Triple Talak bill which gives justice to the Muslim women and help in reducing the atrocities against them by punishing the guilty.

Even if we talk about Bollywood and sensor board which called the most secular industry in the country are not so secular because if we see how they ban the movies like SINS 2005 just because in the movie the maker portrayed the father of the church in the bad light, Black Friday2004 just because in movie shows how on the name of Islam the terrorist plans MUMBAI 1993 serial bomb blasts and the DA VINCI CODE in 2006 which portrayed the church in bad light and many more movies which hurts the sentiment of these one or two minority communities but not recommended a single cut in the movies like PK and many more in which they portrayed a Hindu priest and saint in the bad light. So now if we see these recent trends and the type of reporting did by these some secular media houses I really have this question in my mind are they really secular or on the name of secularism they are running their agenda to defame one community which is definitely a communalist.